SciViD: Video Preprints for Science

A short scholarly manuscript, written in a SciViD template for its type of submission, together with a short video abstract and, where relevant, an interactive lab. As a current free offer, SciViD makes a 1-minute video abstract from the manuscript; authors may also record their own (1–3 minutes). Each posted item has a SciViD identifier and a version number.→ Author Guidelines, section 1

No. Every submission is screened by an editor against a posting checklist (scope, completeness, attribution, permissions, consent and labeling), but screening is not peer review and does not certify that the results are correct. Every posted item is labeled "Preliminary · Not peer reviewed".→ Editorial standards

Editors aim to send a first decision within 2 weeks of a complete submission: approval for posting, changes required, or decline with reasons. If changes are needed, the item moves forward once they are made. Where SciViD makes the video abstract, it is sent to the authors after screening, and the preprint is posted once they approve it.→ Author Guidelines, section 7

No. Posting, posting new versions and hosting an interactive lab are free, and so is the 1-minute video abstract that SciViD currently makes from your manuscript. Mentoring through the NanoTRIZ Research Scholar Program is a separate, optional paid service run by NanoTRIZ Innovation Institute, a business owned by SciViD's founder; paying for it does not affect posting decisions.→ Author Guidelines, section 14

Researchers submit to the Research series through Submit a Preprint. High school, undergraduate and graduate students and early-career researchers use the Emerging Scholars series; graduate students may choose either. Work by an author under 18 is submitted in the Emerging Scholars series by a teacher, mentor, parent or guardian aged 18 or over, with the written consent of a parent or guardian and sign-off from a teacher, mentor or supervisor.→ Author Guidelines, section 2 · Two series

Four types, each with its own Word template:Original research. Experiments and measurements made by the authors. A short communication is the same type in a shorter form.Computational study. Numerical, analytical or machine-learning work: a model or simulation, with its verification and a statement of whether it was compared with experimental data.Review or perspective. A synthesis of published work that cites the original sources. A perspective adds the authors’ own view and labels it as such.Protocol or methods. A real, step-by-step procedure or workflow, with materials, settings, safety precautions and expected results.Popular-science explainers, lectures and course videos that do not present the authors’ own research, review, method or model are not video preprints. Students in the Emerging Scholars series choose from formats listed on that page.→ Author Guidelines, section 3 · Manuscript templates · Emerging Scholars

A manuscript, as a Word file in the template for its type of submission; no video is needed. There are four Word templates, one for each type of submission: original research, computational study, review or perspective, and protocol or methods. Each opens with one page of instructions for authors and ends with a Records page (claims, author contributions and AI use) that only the editors see. Text shaded in grey is completed by SciViD. If you cannot use Word, send a PDF with the same sections and the Records as its last page.→ Manuscript templates · Author Guidelines, sections 3–4

You do not need to make a video. SciViD currently makes a 1-minute video abstract from your manuscript, free of charge, with a disclosed synthetic voice unless you send your own recording, and sends it to you for approval before the preprint is posted. If you make your own, it must be 1 to 3 minutes long, with narration in an author's own voice or a disclosed synthetic voice; an on-screen label on every segment (for example Recorded Data or Conceptual Animation); at least 1920 × 1080 pixels with English subtitles; MP4 (H.264). Slides with narration are enough: editors check these requirements, not production quality.→ Author Guidelines, section 5

Yes, for example for narration, captions, translation, titles and animation, as long as every use is listed in your AI Use Statement and AI-generated visuals are labeled. In the Emerging Scholars series each use is also entered in the AI-use record at the end of the manuscript template. AI must not be used to create or alter data or results, for example by denoising or upscaling recorded footage.→ Integrity Guide

Every submission is screened by an editor before it is posted. Authors have to show their evidence: each key claim is listed with its source or data and the person who checked it, every use of an AI tool is declared, every reference must be one the authors opened and checked, and the manuscript states which results are measured, simulated or untested. Student work also needs the sign-off of a teacher, mentor or supervisor.Fabricated or unverifiable citations and undisclosed use of AI are integrity violations and can lead to a submission being declined. A DOI is not part of this check: it is optional and does not show that a work is sound.→ Editorial standards · Integrity Guide

No. A DOI is optional. You can deposit your work in a repository such as Zenodo and send us the DOI to link; for selected items SciViD may help by prior agreement. SciViD does not arrange a DOI for an item with an author under 18. A DOI does not mean the work is peer reviewed.→ Author Guidelines, section 11

Yes. Posting on SciViD does not prevent journal submission, but check your target journal's preprint policy first. When the paper is published, send us its DOI and we will link it from your preprint.→ Author Guidelines, section 12

You keep the copyright. Unless stated otherwise, items are posted under CC BY 4.0, so third-party material must be public domain, CC0 or CC BY, or used with the owner's written permission.→ Author Guidelines, section 14

Email editor@scivid.net with the identifier, the revised files and a short revision note. Each new version (v2, v3 …) is screened, and earlier versions stay available. A withdrawn item is replaced by a notice that keeps its identifier and title.→ Author Guidelines, sections 9–10

Cite the version you viewed and, where useful, a time range, and always describe it as a preprint. Example: Author A (2026). Title. SciViD Video Preprint SciViD-VP.2026.0001v2, 03:12–04:05. Preprint, not peer reviewed.→ Author Guidelines, section 13

A free teaching demonstration for students: worked examples that show how a text prompt, your own data or a simulation can become a short clip with Manim, Blender or Python. It is separate from the 1-minute video abstract that SciViD currently makes from your manuscript: SciViD does not make or check films in the Studio, and using it has no effect on posting decisions.→ Video Studio

OUR VISIONScholarly publishing remains essential for disseminating knowledge, but it faces persistent problems of cost, access, transparency and format that limit who can participate and how research is communicated. SciViD is being developed as a complementary publishing model that combines video presentation, AI tools that help authors produce their own videos, and an inclusive editorial framework, with the aim of addressing some of these problems.CHALLENGES IN SCHOLARLY PUBLISHINGCost and access. Subscription journals restrict access through paywalls, and many open-access journals charge article processing charges (APCs). Both can disadvantage early-career researchers, students and institutions with limited funding.Opaque peer review. Peer review varies in quality, can be affected by bias, and is rarely visible to readers.Unequal participation. Scholarly publishing is concentrated in a small number of regions, and researchers who are not native English speakers face additional barriers to publication.Limits of static formats. Text and static figures convey dynamic processes, experimental technique and simulations poorly, which can hinder reproduction and teaching.HOW SCIVID RESPONDSFree posting. Posting a video preprint on SciViD is free. As a current free offer, SciViD also makes a 1-minute video abstract from the manuscript. SciViD Video Studio, a teaching demo, offers free example scripts for making your own clips.Transparent status. Every posted item is labeled "Preliminary · Not peer reviewed" and carries a version number and a dated version history.Multilingual access. Every video abstract carries English subtitles, and authors may use AI tools for captions and translation, to widen access for researchers and readers who are not native English speakers.Visual presentation of methods. Video preprints present methods, simulations and devices visually rather than in text alone. This format is intended to support reproduction and to make posted work usable for teaching.AI-assisted production. AI tools for narration, animation, editing and translation are intended to reduce the cost and effort of producing a video preprint. All AI use must be disclosed, and AI-generated visuals must be labeled in accordance with SciViD’s Integrity Guide.Pathways for students. Emerging Scholars gives high school, undergraduate and graduate students a supervised route to posting their research as a video preprint, with parent or guardian consent for authors under 18.

LIMITATIONS OF STATIC PUBLICATION FORMATSThe text-based research paper remains the principal record of scientific work, and its precision and archival stability are not in question. Text and static figures are, however, poorly suited to conveying certain kinds of information: practical technique, dynamic processes, and the course of an experiment or simulation over time. SciViD’s video preprints are intended to address these limitations.1. Under-reported practical techniqueDetails that determine whether an experiment can be repeated, such as instrument settings, timing, sample handling and manual technique, are difficult to specify fully in prose. In the Reproducibility Project: Cancer Biology, none of the experiments selected for replication was described in enough detail to design a replication protocol without contacting the original authors. Incomplete methods reporting is one of several causes of replication failure, alongside publication bias, incomplete statistical reporting, and limited sharing of data and materials; visual documentation of technique addresses only the first of these.2. Dynamic processes reduced to snapshotsProcesses involving motion or transformation, such as fluid flow, self-assembly or the behavior of living cells, must be reconstructed by the reader from a sequence of still images. Research on instructional animation shows a moderate overall learning advantage of animation over static pictures, with larger effects for realistic, video-based material and for learning procedural skills. The benefit is not automatic: dynamic formats help mainly when they show change that static images cannot, and when pacing and signaling are well designed. These findings concern learning outcomes; whether they translate into higher replication success has not, to our knowledge, been tested directly.3. Barriers for readers outside the specialtyResearch papers are written for specialists, and their terminology and compressed style limit access for students, researchers from adjacent fields and non-native English speakers. Video preprints that pair narration with visual explanation can lower some of these barriers, because people generally learn better from words and pictures together than from words alone.4. Video as a supplement rather than the recordMany journals already accept supplementary videos, and dedicated video journals exist. In conventional papers, however, video is usually supplementary material rather than the primary object of review and citation. SciViD treats the video preprint itself as the posted, versioned and citable record.THE PATH FORWARDText-based papers will remain the foundation of the scholarly record. Formats that show what text describes, including video preprints, interactive simulations, and shared data and code, can complement them by making methods easier to see, evaluate and repeat.Reference: Errington TM, Denis A, Perfito N, Iorns E, Nosek BA. Challenges for assessing replicability in preclinical cancer biology. eLife 2021;10:e67995. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.67995

Text-based papers remain the foundation of the scholarly record. SciViD is being developed as a complementary model that keeps the conventions of scholarly publishing while using video to show what text can only describe.1. Scholarly standards with video presentationPosting checklist. Every submission is screened against a posting checklist covering format, originality (including a text similarity check), references, permissions and consent. Posted items are not peer reviewed and are labeled accordingly.Persistent identifiers. A DOI is optional and is not required for posting. Authors may deposit their work in a repository such as Zenodo and provide the DOI for linking; SciViD may assist selected authors by prior agreement. This is not automatic. SciViD does not arrange a DOI for an item with an author under 18.Scholarly structure. The manuscript of each video preprint follows familiar scholarly conventions, set out in a Word template for each type of submission: original research, computational study, review or perspective, and protocol or methods.Visual evidence. Video preprints can show dynamic processes, narrated walkthroughs of experimental setups, and simulation output.The format is particularly suited to fields in which motion and transformation are central, such as microfluidics, nanotechnology, soft matter and experimental biology.2. AccessibilityAccessible video. Every video abstract has English subtitles, a transcript and short text descriptions of key figures, so that the work is accessible to readers with hearing or visual impairments.Low-bandwidth access. Because video requires more bandwidth than text, SciViD aims to offer lower-resolution and downloadable versions for readers with limited connectivity.3. Education and student authorshipTeaching use. Video preprints can be used in flipped classrooms and project-based courses.Student portfolios. Through Emerging Scholars, students can build a public portfolio of posted work in research and scientific communication.Independence of screening. Teachers and mentors may advise students while they prepare their work but have no role in screening their submissions.4. Methodological transparencyDirect observation. In experimental video preprints, viewers can see recorded footage of instrument calibration, sample handling and troubleshooting rather than inferring these steps from written description. Recorded footage is distinguished from conceptual animation in accordance with SciViD’s Integrity Guide.Complement to written protocols. Such footage can complement written protocols, particularly for procedures that depend on manual technique.5. Machine-readable recordsTranscripts and metadata. SciViD plans to publish each video preprint with a transcript and structured metadata, so that its content can be searched, indexed and processed by text-based tools.Interactive extensions. Authors can link an interactive lab to their posted item, and SciViD hosts such labs free of charge, subject to the hosting terms in the Author Guidelines.6. Publishing costsFree posting. Posting is free. As a current free offer, SciViD also makes a 1-minute video abstract from the manuscript. SciViD Video Studio, a teaching demo, offers free example scripts for making your own clips.Institutional partnerships. SciViD welcomes partnerships with schools and universities that wish to use video preprints in teaching and research training.7. Scholarly and public visibilityHosting and versions. Each posted item is hosted on SciViD with its version history; copies may also be shared on public video platforms to reach a wider audience.Discoverability. With structured metadata and, where authors obtain them, DOIs, posted video preprints are intended to be findable through search engines and academic discovery tools.Multiple uses. A single video preprint can serve as a citable research output, a teaching resource, and supporting material for funding applications and conference presentations.SciViD aims to combine established scholarly standards with visual communication, making experimental science easier to follow and authorship more accessible to early-career researchers.

Dear colleagues, educators and students,For nearly two decades I have studied catalytic micro- and nanomotors, rolled-up nanomembranes and microfluidic systems, including postdoctoral research at the Max Planck Institute for Intelligent Systems in Stuttgart, a visiting scholarship at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences, and more than eight years as a tenured professor at Fudan University. As an author, a reviewer for more than 50 journals and a guest editor, I have repeatedly encountered the limits of text and static figures. The motion of a nanomotor or the timing of a microfluidic protocol could be obvious in the laboratory yet hard to convey in print, and students and colleagues sometimes misread procedures that looked clear on paper.I have also seen talented students, particularly those outside well-funded institutions or writing in a second language, struggle to publish their first results.SciViD is my response. Its aim is to keep the core standards of scholarly communication, including honest labeling, versioned and citable records, and transparent ethics, while using video to show what text can only describe. It is intended to complement traditional journals, not to replace them, and to serve both research and teaching.We are building SciViD around three commitments:Integrity: clear posting standards, honest labeling and transparent rules for the use of AI.Inclusion: a supervised pathway for student authors and support for researchers who are not native English speakers.Impact: video preprints that researchers can cite, teachers can use in class and students can learn from.SciViD is at an early stage and is now accepting submissions. I invite you to help build it as an author, editor or partner.Prof. Alexander A. SolovevFounder and Editorial Director, SciViD